Calendar
Monday, February 10, 2025
Time | Items |
---|---|
All day |
|
4:00pm |
02/10/2025 - 4:00pm The celebrated prime geodesic theorem gives the asymptotic formula for the number of primitive closed geodesics according to their length in a closed hyperbolic manifold, i.e., for uniform lattices in SO(n, 1). What’s more, the error term is power-saving. This was generalized with the error term for convex cocompact subgroups by Naud and Stoyanov. It is natural to wonder whether one can generalize this further to the higher rank setting such as SL(n, R). This was done without the error term for Anosov subgroups by Sambarino. In keeping with a principle from Margulis's thesis, we go further and establish exponential mixing of an appropriate dynamical system and use that to produce a power-saving error term. Location:
KT 207
02/10/2025 - 4:00pm We consider orthogonal expansions of holomorphic functions in Location:
KT 809B
02/10/2025 - 4:30pm Let G be a reductive group over the p-adic numbers with P = MU a parabolic subgroup. A basic fact in smooth representation theory is that parabolic induction preserves the property of being admissible. In this talk, we will discuss the analogue of this in the geometrization of the local Langlands program. In particular, smooth representations will be replaced by sheaves on Bun_G, the moduli stack of G-bundles on the Fargues–Fontaine curve, and parabolic induction will be replaced by a geometric Eisenstein functor carrying sheaves on Bun_M to sheaves on Bun_G. The property of being admissible translates into the rather bizarre property of being ULA over a point, which is a new phenomenon native to analytic variants of the geometric Langlands program. The main result we will discuss is that the geometric Eisenstein functor sends sheaves which are ULA over a point on Bun_M to sheaves which are ULA over a point on Bun_G. This generalizes the basic fact on admissibility mentioned at the beginning, and much more interestingly shows that various gluing functors on Bun_G send admissible representations to admissible representations. Along the way, we hope to explain some of the similarities and differences between the usual geometric Langlands programs and the Fargues–Scholze geometric Langlands program, mostly stemming from the differences between l-adic sheaves on algebraic and p-adic analytic spaces, respectively. Location:
KT 801
|